Interpretation & Domination: Adorno & the Habermas-Lyotard Debate

This article explores Theodor Adorno's philosophical method and argues that it furthers resistance to domination. The author compares Adorno's position with those of Jürgen Habermas and Jean-François Lyotard and finds that it includes important elements that these later thinkers have aband...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polity 1993-07, Vol.25 (4), p.597-616
1. Verfasser: Phelan, Shane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article explores Theodor Adorno's philosophical method and argues that it furthers resistance to domination. The author compares Adorno's position with those of Jürgen Habermas and Jean-François Lyotard and finds that it includes important elements that these later thinkers have abandoned. Habermas moves away from Adorno's insistence on the limits of interpretation and the importance of the particular toward total systems, while Lyotard's attempt to do justice to "the event" leaves him without the purchase for critical theory that Adorno pursued.
ISSN:0032-3497
1744-1684
DOI:10.2307/3235124