Variability of morphological traits in sunflower inbred lines
Except agronomic important traits, great diversity in sunflower is present in morphological traits which are very useful in breeding studies. The main objective of the paper was to determine genetic diversity among the 110 inbred lines in the collection of Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops Novi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genetika (Beograd) 2020, Vol.52 (3), p.911-923 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Except agronomic important traits, great diversity in sunflower is present in
morphological traits which are very useful in breeding studies. The main
objective of the paper was to determine genetic diversity among the 110
inbred lines in the collection of Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops
Novi Sad (IFVCNS) by screening 34 morphological traits according to a list
of descriptors of the International Union for the Protection of New
Varieties of Plants (UPOV) as to conduct the Distinctness, Uniformity and
Stability Test (DUS). The diversity of morphological traits was estimated by
Shannon diversity index (H?) and the diversity of sunflower inbred lines was
performed by homogeneity analysis (HOMALS) as well as discriminatory power
of the traits. The values of the traits in Shannon diversity index were the
highest (H?=0.99) for height of the tip of the blade compared to insertion
of petiole and bract position, while branching, head shape and seed color
showed low diversity (H?>0.1). The uniformity of inbred lines distribution
determined discriminative power of descriptors. Disk flower anthocyanin
coloration of stigma, hypocotyl anthocyanin coloration and intensity, leaf
blistering, leaf serration, seed stripes on and between the margins showed
the strongest discriminatory power. According to these six traits, the
collection of inbred lines was divided into two main groups and three
subgroups which better explained the relationships among the various inbred
lines. Inbred lines showed the great variability of morphological traits in
the whole collection and also among the inbred lines from the same type of
use. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0534-0012 1820-6069 |
DOI: | 10.2298/GENSR2003911C |