EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CONVENTIONAL EPIDURAL VERSUS COMBINED SPINAL EPIDURAL IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE AND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of conventional epidural (ED) versus combined spinal epidural (CSE) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with addition of opiods and dexmedetomidine. Methods: This prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical study was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian journal of pharmaceutical and clinical research 2023-05, p.46-50
Hauptverfasser: Rathore, Vikram Singh, Prasad, Sarita, D, Harsha, Sharma, Charu, Partani, Seema
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of conventional epidural (ED) versus combined spinal epidural (CSE) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with addition of opiods and dexmedetomidine. Methods: This prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical study was conducted in the in patients undergoing PCNL. Group CSE had received CSE anesthesia and Group ED given conventional epidural anesthesia. Time to first rescue analgesic and total dose of rescue analgesic along with hemodynamic parameters were compared up to 24 h. Patient, surgeon satisfaction score, and post-operative complications were also compared. Results: Time from onset of sensory block to first requirement of analgesia was prolonged in group CSE (218.4±18.30 min) as compared to Group ED (210±17.88 min). (p
ISSN:0974-2441
0974-2441
DOI:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i5.47218