Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: initial experience
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) scans of the liver were obtained in 12 normal volunteers and 32 patients using a whole-body machine developed by Thorn-EMI Ltd., and the results were compared with x-ray computed tomography (CT). Two types of NMR scan, saturation-recovery and inversion-recovery, were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of roentgenology (1976) 1982-02, Vol.138 (2), p.193-200 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) scans of the liver were obtained in 12 normal volunteers and 32 patients using a whole-body machine developed by Thorn-EMI Ltd., and the results were compared with x-ray computed tomography (CT). Two types of NMR scan, saturation-recovery and inversion-recovery, were performed in order to obtain values for the spin-lattice relaxation time, T1. Although the saturation-recovery scans show little soft-tissue detail, the inversion-recovery scans demonstrated the interlobar fissure, hepatic veins, portal veins, bile ducts, and gallbladder. In comparison with CT (Siemens Somatom 2), both types of NMR scan showed some blurring due to respiratory movement but much less linear artifact across the liver from the air-fluid interface in the stomach. Focal disease within the liver was demonstrated by both CT and NMR, although an area of focal atrophy and another of hepatic infarction were only recognized with NMR. In diffuse disease the pattern varied. In steatosis CT was virtually diagnostic, while NMR showed no specific features. In hemochromatosis, hepatitis, eight cases of cirrhosis, and one of Wilson disease, both techniques showed abnormalities of varying specificity. In two cases of cirrhosis and one of primary biliary cirrhosis, only the NMR scan was abnormal. Nuclear magnetic resonance images are now sufficiently anatomically detailed to permit serious comparisons with technically advanced computed tomography. The information revealed is fundamentally different and can be expected to have some diagnostic utility. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
DOI: | 10.2214/ajr.138.2.193 |