Double-blind comparison of meglumine iodamide and Renografin-60 for excretory urography

A double blind comparison of meglumine iodamide and Renografin-60 in bolus intravenous pyelography, using 50 ml of contrast or less, was conducted in 78 patients. Meglumine iodamide produced more dense opacifications, but it also produced a greater number of laboratory abnormalities. All were transi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	American journal of roentgenology (1976) 1977-02, Vol.128 (2), p.211-215
Hauptverfasser:	Gerzof, SG, Robbins, AH, Unger, G, Zaki, A, Wickis, EA
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Aged Clinical Trials as Topic Diatrizoate - analogs & derivatives Diatrizoate Meglumine - adverse effects Female Humans Iodamide - analogs & derivatives Iodobenzoates Male Meglumine - adverse effects Middle Aged Radiographic Image Enhancement Urography Urologic Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	A double blind comparison of meglumine iodamide and Renografin-60 in bolus intravenous pyelography, using 50 ml of contrast or less, was conducted in 78 patients. Meglumine iodamide produced more dense opacifications, but it also produced a greater number of laboratory abnormalities. All were transient and mild. No serious abnormalities resulted from the use of either agent.
ISSN:	0361-803X 1546-3141
DOI:	10.2214/ajr.128.2.211