Whole-body MRI versus 18 F-FDG PET/CT for pretherapeutic assessment and staging of lymphoma: a meta-analysis
F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the reference standard in staging of F-FDG-avid lymphomas; however, there is no recommended functional imaging modality for indolent lymphomas. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of whole-body magn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | OncoTargets and therapy 2018-06, Vol.11, p.3597-3608 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | F-fluorodeoxyglucose (
F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the reference standard in staging of
F-FDG-avid lymphomas; however, there is no recommended functional imaging modality for indolent lymphomas. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) with that of
F-FDG PET/CT for lesion detection and initial staging in patients with aggressive or indolent lymphoma.
We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases for studies that compared WB-MRI with
F-FDG PET/CT for lymphoma staging or lesion detection. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using version 2 of the "Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies" tool. The pooled staging accuracy (
) of WB-MRI and
F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging and for assessing possible heterogeneity (
) across studies were calculated using commercially available software.
Eight studies comprising 338 patients were included. In terms of staging, the meta-analytic staging accuracies of WB-MRI and
F-FDG PET/CT for Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were 98% (95% CI, 94%-100%) and 98% (95% CI, 94%-100%), respectively. The pooled staging accuracy of
F-FDG PET/CT dropped to 87% (95% CI, 72%-97%) for staging in patients with indolent lymphoma, whereas that of WB-MRI remained 96% (95% CI, 91%-100%). Subgroup analysis indicated an even lower staging accuracy of
F-FDG PET/CT for staging of less FDG-avid indolent NHLs (60%; 95% CI, 23%-92%), in contrast to the superior performance of WB-MRI (98%; 95% CI, 88%-100%).
WB-MRI is a promising radiation-free imaging technique that may serve as a viable alternative to
F-FDG PET/CT for staging of
FDG-avid lymphomas, where
F-FDG PET/CT remains the standard of care. Additionally, WB-MRI seems a less histology-dependent functional imaging test than
F-FDG PET/CT and may be the imaging test of choice for staging of indolent NHLs with low
F-FDG avidity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1178-6930 1178-6930 |
DOI: | 10.2147/OTT.S148189 |