Effect of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers on Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Crop Yields: A Meta‐analysis
Core Ideas Effectiveness of EEFs varied greatly with their modes of action, soils, and management factors. NIs, DIs, and CRFs reduced N2O emissions by 38, 30, and 19%, respectively, compared with conventional N fertilizers. NIs increased overall crop yields by 7% compared with conventional N fertili...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil Science Society of America journal 2016-09, Vol.80 (5), p.1121-1134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Core Ideas
Effectiveness of EEFs varied greatly with their modes of action, soils, and management factors.
NIs, DIs, and CRFs reduced N2O emissions by 38, 30, and 19%, respectively, compared with conventional N fertilizers.
NIs increased overall crop yields by 7% compared with conventional N fertilizers.
DIs might provide added benefits over NIs in alkaline soils, coarse‐textured soils, and irrigated systems.
Enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) have the potential to reduce N2O emissions and improve crop productivity, but the impact of soil and management conditions on their effectiveness is not clear. We conducted a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of different EEF types in reducing N2O emissions in three cereal production systems: rice (Oryza sativa L.), corn (Zea mays L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). We also compared EEF efficacy across soil and management conditions for corn and wheat systems. Results showed that the effect of EEFs on N2O emissions and crop yields varied greatly with their modes of action, soil types, and management conditions. Nitrification inhibitors (NIs), double inhibitors (DIs: urease plus nitrification inhibitors), and controlled‐release N fertilizers (CRFs) consistently reduced N2O emissions compared with conventional N fertilizers across soil and management conditions (grand mean decreases of 38, 30, and 19%, respectively). The DIs more effectively reduced N2O emissions in alkaline soils than did NIs, but the trend was reversed in acidic soils. Urease inhibitors also reduced N2O emissions compared with conventional N fertilizers in coarse‐textured soils and irrigated systems. Overall crop yields increased by 7% with the addition of NIs alone. Compared with conventional N fertilizers, DIs also increased crop yields in alkaline soils, coarse‐textured soils, and irrigated systems. However, CRFs had no effect on crop yields. Overall, this study suggests that NIs or DIs can reduce N2O emissions while improving crop yields. Growers should select EEFs based on their soil and management conditions to maximize their effectiveness. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0361-5995 1435-0661 |
DOI: | 10.2136/sssaj2016.06.0179 |