Phenological Temperature Response of Maize

Variability of development rate estimates across locations and years using the current heat unit system of growing degree‐days (GDD) with maximum and minimum temperature thresholds of 30 and 10°C (GDD30,10) limits predictability of maturity in hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Data sets of daily maximum a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 1998-01, Vol.90 (1), p.73-79
Hauptverfasser: Stewart, Douglas W., Dwyer, Lianne M., Carrigan, Lori L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Variability of development rate estimates across locations and years using the current heat unit system of growing degree‐days (GDD) with maximum and minimum temperature thresholds of 30 and 10°C (GDD30,10) limits predictability of maturity in hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Data sets of daily maximum and minimum air temperatures and dates of maize development stages were collected for a range of hybrids at locations in Canada and the northern USA (39° to 45° N lat). Data were analyzed to improve the temperature response functions for maize at different stages of development. Results indicate that during vegetative growth, phenological response to mean daily air temperature followed a sigmoidal curve beginning below 5°C, with maximum response to temperatures between 25 and 30°C. During reproductive growth, the temperature response function was flat from 0 to 12°C and rose significantly only with mean daily air temperatures greater than this range. A general thermal index (GTI) based on these two response functions improved estimation of maturity dates by 50% over estimates made using GDD30,10 (SE of 6.7 d for GTI and 13.6 d for GDD30,10 in estimating time from planting to maturity). The greatest improvement using GTI occurred for the reproductive period (SE of 5.8 d using GTI, compared with 12.1 d using GDD30,10). These results suggest that incorporating the temperature response function reported in this paper would improve prediction of maize development.
ISSN:0002-1962
1435-0645
DOI:10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000010014x