The psychological impacts of nudge-based evacuation advisories
This study examined the psychological effects of disaster prevention nudges. The participants (total N=1,330) read a scenario describing approaching danger with either a loss-framed evacuation advisory or a non-framed control one and reported their intentions to evacuate, feelings of guilt, and perc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Jikken shakai shinrigaku kenkyū 2022, Vol.62(1), pp.38-43 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study examined the psychological effects of disaster prevention nudges. The participants (total N=1,330) read a scenario describing approaching danger with either a loss-framed evacuation advisory or a non-framed control one and reported their intentions to evacuate, feelings of guilt, and perceived external pressure (Study 1) and rated extrinsic motivational regulation (Study 2). Moreover, in Study 3 the participants were presented with the same scenario and one of three evacuation advisories (loss-framed, gain-framed, and control advisories) and indicated their behavioral intentions, feeling of guilt, perceived external pressure, and extrinsic motivation as in Studies 1 and 2. Both frames increased the participants’ intentions to evacuate, feelings of guilt, and perceived external pressure. However, their effects on extrinsic motivation differed: the loss-framed advisory enhanced all three types of extrinsic motivation, whereas the gain-frame advisory increased only identified regulation. The implications for future work on nudges are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0387-7973 1348-6276 |
DOI: | 10.2130/jjesp.2113 |