The Constitutional Implications Of Employee Urine Testing
Whether employers may resort to compulsory urine testing to detect workplace-related drug use is one of the most hotly debated legal issues of the 1980s. Testing advocates stress the myriad problems that drug-impaired workers cause, including safety risks and faulty products, and they emphasize the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied business research 2011-10, Vol.5 (1), p.68 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Whether employers may resort to compulsory urine testing to detect workplace-related drug use is one of the most hotly debated legal issues of the 1980s. Testing advocates stress the myriad problems that drug-impaired workers cause, including safety risks and faulty products, and they emphasize the effectiveness of this technique in identifying such employees.Opponents grant the need for a drug-free work setting but argue that urine testing is an excessively unreliable and intrusive means of obtaining one. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0892-7626 2157-8834 |
DOI: | 10.19030/jabr.v5i1.6378 |