Incidental findings in brain CT scans of patients with head trauma

Objective: Incidental findings (IFs) are newly discovered abnormal findings unrelated to the primary purpose of imaging. Brain computed tomography (CT) scan is one of the most essential and initial imaging evaluations for head trauma patients, which may also have nontraumatic IFs. We aim to investig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in emergency medicine 2024-05
Hauptverfasser: Alinezhad, Marzieh, Alikhani, Fariba, Bamarinejad, Fatemeh, Bamarinejad, Aatefeh, Hosseinzadeh, Fatemezahra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Incidental findings (IFs) are newly discovered abnormal findings unrelated to the primary purpose of imaging. Brain computed tomography (CT) scan is one of the most essential and initial imaging evaluations for head trauma patients, which may also have nontraumatic IFs. We aim to investigate the prevalence and nature of IFs in brain CT scans of head trauma patients. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate brain CT scans of 1006 head trauma patients over one year (April 2021 to March 2022), to identify incidental findings by consensus agreement of two radiologists. We categorized the incidental findings into four categories based on appropriate follow-up recommendations. Results: We included 1006 head trauma patients who underwent brain CT scan, of which 126 incidental findings were discovered in brain CT scan of 107 patients. The prevalence of incidental findings was 10.6% (107/1006). The most common incidental finding was brain atrophy (n=15, 11.9%). The mean age of patients with IFs was significantly higher than those without IFs, but there was no difference between the two groups regarding gender. Conclusion: The discovery rate of incidental findings of brain CT scans in head trauma patients was considerable. Serious medical findings that need immediate evaluation were found in 5.6% of patients, mostly over the age of 40. Therefore, patients who have clinically significant incidental findings need improved documentation and follow-up to evaluate the long-term outcomes and reliability of imaging results.
ISSN:2717-3593
2717-3593
DOI:10.18502/fem.v8i2.15464