Effectiveness Evaluation of ICDs Implanted in the Right Side vs. Left Side

Background: The implantation of ICDs left pectorally is the conventional normal practice, but pathological reasons may obly to insert the devices on the right side. The aim of our evaluation was to define the outcome of right-sided implantation (n=52) on defibrillation effectiveness in comparison to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ICF journal 2017-06, Vol.11
Hauptverfasser: Kiuchi, Marcio Galindo, Chen, Shaojie, Paz, Luis Marcelo Rodrigues, Pürerfellner, Helmut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The implantation of ICDs left pectorally is the conventional normal practice, but pathological reasons may obly to insert the devices on the right side. The aim of our evaluation was to define the outcome of right-sided implantation (n=52) on defibrillation effectiveness in comparison to the left-sided ICD implantation (n=210).Methods: A cohort of patients received standard therapy for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with the structural cardiac disease, lay open to the ICD-DR implantation. The 262 individuals who had all the inclusion criteria were comprised in the assessment.Results: The defibrillation threshold testing (DFT), at the end of implantation showed that the mean energy to revert a programmed induced sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was 33.4±6.3 J for the patients that had the ICD implanted on the right side, and 23.9±5.3 J for the ones that presented the ICD positioned on the left side, P
ISSN:2410-2636
2409-3424
DOI:10.17987/icfj.v11i0.443