Electrocardiographic Effects of Lofexidine and Methadone Coadministration: Secondary Findings from a Safety Study

Study Objective. To determine the electrocardiographic effects of coadministration of lofexidine and methadone. Design. Prospective, double‐blind study. Setting. Outpatient drug treatment research clinic. Participants. Fourteen adults (mean ± SD age 34.9 ± 5.3 yrs) with physical dependence on opioid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacotherapy 2009-05, Vol.29 (5), p.495-502
Hauptverfasser: Schmittner, John, Schroeder, Jennifer R., Epstein, David H., Krantz, Mori J., Eid, Nicole C., Preston, Kenzie L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study Objective. To determine the electrocardiographic effects of coadministration of lofexidine and methadone. Design. Prospective, double‐blind study. Setting. Outpatient drug treatment research clinic. Participants. Fourteen adults (mean ± SD age 34.9 ± 5.3 yrs) with physical dependence on opioids. Intervention. Participants were stabilized on methadone maintenance therapy, reaching a target dose of 80 mg/day. After 3 weeks of methadone stabilization, participants received lofexidine 0.4 mg or placebo once/day, each for 1 week, administered at the same time as methadone. From weeks 3–8, all subjects received lofexidine, with the dose escalated each week in 0.2‐mg increments so that by week 8, participants were receiving lofexidine 1.6 mg/day. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained at baseline (before methadone), after stabilization with methadone, and after lofexidine coadministration during peak plasma lofexidine levels. Measurements and Main Results. Prespecified outcome measures of mean and maximal changes in heart rate, and PR, QRS, and QTc intervals were obtained after stabilization with methadone and after lofexidine 0.4 mg coadministration. Repeated‐measures regression showed no significant changes in heart rate or PR, QRS, or QTc interval after methadone stabilization, but a significant decrease in heart rate (mean ± SD −8.0 ± 7.3 beats/min, p=0.0006) after starting lofexidine. When data were analyzed by using maximal ECG response, again, no significant changes were noted during methadone induction compared with baseline, but significant changes did occur in all four ECG parameters when lofexidine was coadministered: decreased heart rate (mean ± SD −9.6 ± 5.8 beats/min, p 40 msec). Conclusion. Our preliminary data suggest that coadministration of lofexidine and methadone induces QTc interval prolongation. This drug combination should be prescribed cautiously, with ECG monitoring. Furthermore, because the participants with the largest changes in QTc interval in our study were female, women may be at highest risk.
ISSN:0277-0008
1875-9114
DOI:10.1592/phco.29.5.495