The Onto-Historical Nature of the Educational Principle: Gramsci and Lukács

ABSTRACT This article addresses the distinctions and approximations between Gramsci and Lukács’ elaborations about the educational principle. The possibility of work being or not an educational principle was questioned, as the basis of an emancipatory political-pedagogical project. For that, an imma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educação e realidade 2023, Vol.48
Hauptverfasser: Sobral, Karine Martins, Santos, José Deribaldo Gomes dos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT This article addresses the distinctions and approximations between Gramsci and Lukács’ elaborations about the educational principle. The possibility of work being or not an educational principle was questioned, as the basis of an emancipatory political-pedagogical project. For that, an immanent reading of the works was carried out: The Ontology of the Social Being (TOSB), volume 14, by Georg Lukács; Prison Notebooks, volumes 11, 12 and 22, and some Selections from Political Writings, by Antonio Gramsci. As a result of the research, the educational principle, which aims to ground an educational system based on the integral development of social beings, was defended as a human formation. RESUMO O presente artigo aborda as distinções e as aproximações entre as elaborações de Gramsci e Lukács acerca do princípio educativo. Problematizou-se a possibilidade de o trabalho ser ou não um princípio educativo, como base de um projeto político-pedagógico emancipador. Para tanto, realizou-se uma leitura imanente das obras:Para a Ontologia do Ser Social, volume 14, de Georg Lukács;Cadernos do Cárcere, volumes 11, 12 e 22, e algunsEscritos Políticos, de Antônio Gramsci. Como resultados da pesquisa, o princípio educativo, que tenha como desígnio fundamentar um sistema educacional pautado no desenvolvimento integral dos seres sociais, foi defendido como formação humana.
ISSN:0100-3143
2175-6236
DOI:10.1590/2175-6236117986vs02