Impact of Specialized Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators on Craniofacial and Alveolar Bone Regeneration: Scoping Review

Craniofacial bone defects caused by tumors, trauma, long-term tooth loss, or periodontal disease are a major challenge in the field of tissue engineering. In periodontitis and peri-implantitis, reconstructive therapy is also a major challenge for the dental surgeon. Lipoxins, resolvins, protectins,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brazilian dental journal 2024, Vol.35, p.e246133
Hauptverfasser: Rovai, Emanuel da Silva, Polassi, Mackeler, Silveira, Marcela Iunes da, Araújo, Sandy Lima, Dyke, Thomas Van, Santos, Nidia C Castro Dos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Craniofacial bone defects caused by tumors, trauma, long-term tooth loss, or periodontal disease are a major challenge in the field of tissue engineering. In periodontitis and peri-implantitis, reconstructive therapy is also a major challenge for the dental surgeon. Lipoxins, resolvins, protectins, and maresins, known as specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs), have been widely studied in the field of dental, oral, and craniofacial research for bone regeneration for their actions in restoring tissue homeostasis and promoting tissue healing and regeneration. Therefore, this study focuses on a survey of the use of SPMs for craniofacial and alveolar bone regeneration. Thus, electronic searches of five databases were performed to identify pre-clinical studies that evaluated the actions of SMPs on craniofacial and alveolar bone regeneration. Of the 523 articles retrieved from the electronic databases, 19 were included in the analysis. Resolvin (Rv) E1 was the mostly assessed SPM (n=8), followed by maresins (Ma) R1 (n=3), lipoxins (Lx) A4 (n=3), RvD1 (n=3), RvD2 (n=1), LxB4 (n=1), and maresin (M)-CTR3 (n=1). Meta-analysis showed that SPMs increased the newly formed bone by 14.85% compared to the control group (p
ISSN:0103-6440
1806-4760
DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202406133