Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the tensile strength of glass fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments. Forty-eight maxillary canines had their crowns sectioned and root canals endodontically treated. The roots were embedded in acrylic resin and distributed into 3 groups according to the surface treatment: Group I: the posts were treated with silane agent for 30 s and adhesive; Group II: the posts were cleaned with alcohol before treatment with silane agent and adhesive; Group III: the posts were submitted to conditioning with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 s before treatment with silane agent and adhesive. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups for adhesive polymerization or not before insertion into the canal: A - adhesive was not light cured and B - adhesive was light cured. All posts were cemented with Panavia F and the samples were subjected to tensile strength test in a universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. There was statistically significant difference (p0.05). It was concluded that the products used for cleaning the posts influenced the retention regardless of adhesive light curing. O objetivo deste estudo in vitro foi avaliar a resistência à tração de pinos de fibra de vidro submetidos a diferentes tratamentos de superfície. Quarenta e oito caninos superiores tiveram suas coroas seccionadas e as raízes tratadas endodonticamente. As raízes foram incluídas em resina acrílica e distribuídas em 3 grupos de acordo com o tratamento de superfície aplicado aos pinos: Grupo I: os pinos receberam agente silano por 30 s e adesivo; Grupo II: os pinos foram limpos com álcool e então receberam o agente silano e adesivo; Grupo III: os pinos foram submetidos ao condicionamento com ácido fosfórico a 37% por 30 s, seguido de agente silano e adesivo. Cada grupo foi dividido em 2 subgrupos de acordo com fotoativação do adesivo antes da inserção do pino no interior do canal: A – adesivo não foi fotoativado, B: o adesivo foi fotoativado. Todos os pinos foram cimentados com Panavia F e as amostras foram submetidas a teste de tração utilizando máquina universal de ensaios, com velocidade de 1 mm/min. Os dados obtidos foram submetidos à ANOVA a um critério e ao teste de Tukey com nível de significância de 5%. Houve diferença estat