Investigation on wax-impregnated wood. Part 2: Study of void spaces filled with air by He pycnometry, Hg intrusion porosimetry, and 3D X-ray imaging
The quantification of wax and remaining voids filled with air in wax-treated wood has not been described in detail in the literature, although such products are commercially available. In this paper, Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) samples were impregnated with a hot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Holzforschung 2010-08, Vol.64 (5), p.587-593 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The quantification of wax and remaining voids filled with air in wax-treated wood has not been described in detail in the literature, although such products are commercially available. In this paper, Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) samples were impregnated with a hot melting amide wax and characterized. The apparent densities were measured with helium pycnometry and mercury intrusion porosimetry. The pore size distribution was determined by means of mercury intrusion porosimetry and samples were visualized with 3D X-ray tomography. The remaining void spaces were calculated based on the data of all three methods. The apparent densities range from 1.18 to 1.19 g cm-3 for treated pine and from 1.21 to 1.23 g cm-3 for treated beech. As a result of the wax impregnation, the pore volume decreases from 65–68% to 12–13% for pine and from 53–58% to 7–9% for beech. The pore size distribution shifts to smaller pores. The amount of the micropores measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry is overestimated. On the one hand, blocked large pores are compressed by the movement of wax deposits under high pressure during the mercury intrusion porosimetry (“movement-effect”). On the other hand, large pores remain inaccessible or are only accessible via smaller openings (“bottle-neck-effect”). Non-invasive 3D X-ray imaging detects such macropores but the size of the detected pores is limited by the given resolution of the method. Therefore, mercury intrusion porosimetry and X-ray tomography are complementary techniques. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-3830 1437-434X |
DOI: | 10.1515/hf.2010.090 |