Dehydration of Ethanol by PSA Process with Pressure Equalization Step Added
In this work, the ethanol dehydration production process is carried out using the Mathematical Modeling Pressure Adsorption Process. A new model is suggested, it has two equalization steps, and is compared with the Industrial Pressure Swing Process operating cycle. An analysis of the effects of intr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioethanol (De Gruyter Open) 2016-01, Vol.2 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this work, the ethanol dehydration production
process is carried out using the Mathematical Modeling
Pressure Adsorption Process. A new model is suggested, it has
two equalization steps, and is compared with the Industrial
Pressure Swing Process operating cycle. An analysis of
the effects of introducing the pressure equalization step
is performed on four main response variables: purity,
production, recovery and energy consumption and it is
compared with the current cycle configuration operating in
the industry. We used Aspen Adsorption for the valuation
and simulation of the cyclic PSA process. We analyzed and
processed the simulation results in Statgraphics Centurion
to obtain optimum operating conditions for the process.
This evaluation shows that purity decreases slightly,
whereas recovery and production increase. The most
important thing is that the energy consumption is reduced.
These results clearly show that by modifying the operating
cycle schema, optimum operating conditions also change.
The optimization of the new cycle was executed considering
as variables bed pressure, adsorption time and purging
flow. We found that a smaller column is more productive
for the equalization cycle than that of a 14m bed, which is
optimal in the industrial cycle with a consequent reduction
in adsorbent material. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2299-6788 2299-6788 |
DOI: | 10.1515/bioeth-2016-0004 |