Olfactory function and olfactory bulbs in patients with Kallmann syndrome

BACKGROUND: The majority of Kallmann patients have anosmia or hyposmia. This is how the disease is diagnosed. Some of them don’t have such complaints but olfactory dysfunction is diagnosed via olfactometry. Nowadays there is the lack of information about correlation between olfactometry results and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Problemy ėndokrinologii 2023-05, Vol.69 (2), p.67-74
Hauptverfasser: Kokoreva, K. D., Chugunov, I. S., Vladimirova, V. P., Ivannikova, T. E., Bogdanov, V. P., Bezlepkina, O. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; rus
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: The majority of Kallmann patients have anosmia or hyposmia. This is how the disease is diagnosed. Some of them don’t have such complaints but olfactory dysfunction is diagnosed via olfactometry. Nowadays there is the lack of information about correlation between olfactometry results and subjective complaints. Correlation between olfactory bulbs size and olfactory dysfunction has been little studied. AIM: To explore olfactory bulb size and olfactory function in patients with congenital isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. To correlate olfactory bulb sizes and smell test scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS : Single-centre comparative study. 34 patients were included. The main group consisted of 19 patients with hypogonadotropic (15 –with Kallmann syndrome, 4 — with normosmic hypogonadism). Olfactory bulbs MRI were provided to all the patients, olfactory test (Sniffin’ Sticks Test) and molecular-genetic studies were provided in all patients with hypogonadism. Control group consisted of 15 patients who were provided with orbits MRI. Olfactory bulbs were evaluated additionally in them. RESULTS: Normal size of olfactory bulbs were only in 1 patient with hypogonadism. Olfactory bulbs height and width were significantly smaller in patients with hypogonadism in comparison with control group (p
ISSN:0375-9660
2308-1430
DOI:10.14341/probl13216