Why educators should bring an end to pedagogy
As Australia is moving towards a national curriculum there are also activities to nationalise teacher education. This involves various departments of state and federal governments, third-party bodies funded by government such as the Curriculum Corporation and Teaching Australia, and non-government o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Australian journal of teacher education 2009-02, Vol.34 (1), p.42-53 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | As Australia is moving towards a national curriculum there are also activities to nationalise teacher education. This involves various departments of state and federal governments, third-party bodies funded by government such as the Curriculum Corporation and Teaching Australia, and non-government organisations such as the Business Council of Australia. These agencies are producing models and principles which aim to establish standards of best practice for how they want teachers to teach. Within all of this activity the term 'pedagogy' is often employed to represent aspects of these best practices. Examples include 'productive pedagogies', 'new pedagogies', 'pedagogical content knowledge' and 'pedagogical strategies'. However these are all means only without any end purposes which identify them as being valuable for education. The author argues that in order to have educative value teachers themselves must exercise a degree of professional autonomy to bring their own end purposes to their choice of pedagogy. [Author abstract] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0313-5373 1835-517X 1835-517X |
DOI: | 10.14221/ajte.2009v34n1.4 |