Limitations of beam-control compensation

In this paper, we use wave-optics simulations to explore the limitations of beam-control compensation. We evaluate performance in terms of the normalized power in a diffraction-limited bucket for the cases of no beam-control compensation, perfect phase compensation, and perfect full-field compensati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Optics express 2024-11, Vol.32 (24), p.42301
Hauptverfasser: Kalensky, Matthew, Getts, Darren, Banet, Matthias T., Burrell, Derek J., Hyde, Milo W., Spencer, Mark F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, we use wave-optics simulations to explore the limitations of beam-control compensation. We evaluate performance in terms of the normalized power in a diffraction-limited bucket for the cases of no beam-control compensation, perfect phase compensation, and perfect full-field compensation. From these results, we are able to arrive at the following conclusions: (1) without any form of beam-control compensation, performance begins to degrade when D / r 0 > 1; (2) with perfect phase compensation, performance begins to degrade when D / r 0 > 1 and ( λ / r 0 )/ θ 0 > 1; and (3) with perfect full-field compensation, performance begins to degrade when D / r 0 > 1 and ( λ / D )/ θ 0 > 1. Here, D is the aperture diameter, r 0 is the Fried parameter, λ is the wavelength, and θ 0 is the isoplanatic angle. We show (1)–(3) to be true for varying aperture diameters, uniformly distributed turbulence, and varying turbulence profiles. These findings will inform the development of future laser systems that need to sense and correct for the effects of atmospheric turbulence.
ISSN:1094-4087
1094-4087
DOI:10.1364/OE.539797