Atmospheric turbulence and the resolution limits of large ground-based telescopes: comment
The paper by McKechnie is discussed, in which McKechnie tries to explain astronomers` visual descriptions of bright cores in star images by using his own model of atmospheric inhomogeneities, which is different from the conventional turbulent model. In this Communication we show that the star images...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Optical Society of America, Part A: Optics and Image Science Part A: Optics and Image Science, 1993-11, Vol.10 (11), p.2410 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The paper by McKechnie is discussed, in which McKechnie tries to explain astronomers` visual descriptions of bright cores in star images by using his own model of atmospheric inhomogeneities, which is different from the conventional turbulent model. In this Communication we show that the star images presented by McKechnie are consistent with the traditional turbulent model. The McKechnie model of scattering, a single-scale atmosphere with the characteristic scale L{sub 0} {approx_equal} 35 cm, contradicts an our experiences with turbulence: both direct in situ measurements of turbulent characteristics and indirect experiments of wave propagation in a turbulent atmosphere. 32 refs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1084-7529 1520-8532 |
DOI: | 10.1364/JOSAA.10.002410 |