Wildfire Burn Severity Affects Postfire Shifts in Evapotranspiration in Subalpine Forests

Highlights After wildfire, actual evapotranspiration (ETa) in four subalpine areas decreased proportionally to burn severity. High-severity burn areas maintained the highest ETa before fire and the lowest ETa after fire. After fire, ETa decreased more in areas that had higher prefire ETa. ETa was a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Natural Resources and Agricultural Ecosystems 2023, Vol.1 (1), p.1-11
Hauptverfasser: Mankin, Kyle R., Patel, Rhythm
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Highlights After wildfire, actual evapotranspiration (ETa) in four subalpine areas decreased proportionally to burn severity. High-severity burn areas maintained the highest ETa before fire and the lowest ETa after fire. After fire, ETa decreased more in areas that had higher prefire ETa. ETa was a useful system-level measure of susceptibility to fire and impact after fire. Abstract. The ecohydrologic response to fire is complex, with devastating consequences for source-water hydrology. Postfire canopy structure, leaf area, infiltration, and soil-water storage all may act to reduce evapotranspiration (ET), a key hydrologic variable and indicator of ecohydrologic function. This study explored the use of 30-m resolution Landsat-based SSEBop-model estimates of actual ET (ETa) to assess the effects of fire in the Upper Rio Grande Basin (2002 Million Fire, CO; 1996 Hondo Fire, NM; 2002 Montoya Fire, NM; 2000 Cerro Grande Fire, NM). SSEBop ETa data from 1985-2019 were analyzed to better understand postfire response and recovery in several sub-alpine burned areas. Results show step reductions in ETa after fire across all burn severities in all four fire areas. Prior to the fire, ETa was generally higher in high-severity burn areas, indicative of higher fuel loads, although high variability indicated the influence of additional factors. All areas had a greater response (decreased ETa) to fire in high-severity areas and a lesser response as burn severity decreased. The decrease in ETa after high-severity fire ranged from 42% to 63%, compared to the decrease after low-severity fire, which ranged from 24% to 44%. None of the four burn areas demonstrated postfire ETa recovery after 17 to 23 years. This study demonstrates the clear utility for remote-sensing ETa estimates as a system-level measure of susceptibility to fire, impact of fire, and, potentially, recovery after fire. However, additional research is needed to account for the covariate effects of other fuel, topographic, weather, and climate factors. Keywords: Ecohydrology, Postfire recovery, Remote sensing, Upper Rio Grande Basin.
ISSN:2835-2351
2835-2351
DOI:10.13031/jnrae.15438