The Power Is in Parsimony: Commentary on Goltz's Operant Analysis of Power Interpretation of Resistance to Change

The Power Is in Parsimony: Commentary on Goltz's Operant Analysis of Power Interpretation of Resistance to Change

Comments on Goltz and Hietapelto's article Using the Operant and Strategic Contingencies Models of Power to Understand Resistance to Change are presented. One of the major challenges that we have in dealing with "resistance to change" as a subject matter is to operationally define wha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of organizational behavior management 2003-08, Vol.22 (3), p.23-27
1. Verfasser: Boyce, Thomas E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Organizational behavior
Organizational change
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 3
container_start_page 23
container_title Journal of organizational behavior management
container_volume 22
creator Boyce, Thomas E.
description Comments on Goltz and Hietapelto's article Using the Operant and Strategic Contingencies Models of Power to Understand Resistance to Change are presented. One of the major challenges that we have in dealing with "resistance to change" as a subject matter is to operationally define what is meant. In the Goltz and Hietapelto paper, a clear behavioral definition of "resistance to change" seems to be missing.
doi_str_mv 10.1300/J075v22n03_03
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1300_J075v22n03_03</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>405832781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-6c351cd0529efb80aa8575593646635228afa82dc7f519e878a59911049a6ff23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjzFPwzAUhC0EEqEwMrBF7IFnO3bsEVVQiirRocyWcWyRKonLc0qVf09QWZCY7obv7nSEXFO4oxzg_gUq8cVYD9wAPyEZFSUUSkJ5SjKgcvIg6Tm5SGkLQFkJPCM3mw-fr-PBY75MedPna4up6WI_XpKzYNvkr351Rt6eHjfz52L1uljOH1aFY7IaCum4oK4GwbQP7wqsVaISQnNZSskFY8oGq1jtqiCo9qpSVmhNKZTayhAYn5HbY-8O4-fep8Fs4x77adJQrZlkTPAJKo6Qw5gS-mB22HQWR0PB_Jw3f85PvDryTR8idvYQsa3NYMc2YkDbuyYZ_n_0GxYjW_Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199262253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Power Is in Parsimony: Commentary on Goltz's Operant Analysis of Power Interpretation of Resistance to Change</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Boyce, Thomas E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyce, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><description>Comments on Goltz and Hietapelto's article Using the Operant and Strategic Contingencies Models of Power to Understand Resistance to Change are presented. One of the major challenges that we have in dealing with "resistance to change" as a subject matter is to operationally define what is meant. In the Goltz and Hietapelto paper, a clear behavioral definition of "resistance to change" seems to be missing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-8061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1300/J075v22n03_03</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Organizational behavior ; Organizational change</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior management, 2003-08, Vol.22 (3), p.23-27</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Haworth Press, Inc. 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-6c351cd0529efb80aa8575593646635228afa82dc7f519e878a59911049a6ff23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyce, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Power Is in Parsimony: Commentary on Goltz's Operant Analysis of Power Interpretation of Resistance to Change</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior management</title><description>Comments on Goltz and Hietapelto's article Using the Operant and Strategic Contingencies Models of Power to Understand Resistance to Change are presented. One of the major challenges that we have in dealing with "resistance to change" as a subject matter is to operationally define what is meant. In the Goltz and Hietapelto paper, a clear behavioral definition of "resistance to change" seems to be missing.</description><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><issn>0160-8061</issn><issn>1540-8604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptjzFPwzAUhC0EEqEwMrBF7IFnO3bsEVVQiirRocyWcWyRKonLc0qVf09QWZCY7obv7nSEXFO4oxzg_gUq8cVYD9wAPyEZFSUUSkJ5SjKgcvIg6Tm5SGkLQFkJPCM3mw-fr-PBY75MedPna4up6WI_XpKzYNvkr351Rt6eHjfz52L1uljOH1aFY7IaCum4oK4GwbQP7wqsVaISQnNZSskFY8oGq1jtqiCo9qpSVmhNKZTayhAYn5HbY-8O4-fep8Fs4x77adJQrZlkTPAJKo6Qw5gS-mB22HQWR0PB_Jw3f85PvDryTR8idvYQsa3NYMc2YkDbuyYZ_n_0GxYjW_Y</recordid><startdate>20030804</startdate><enddate>20030804</enddate><creator>Boyce, Thomas E.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030804</creationdate><title>The Power Is in Parsimony</title><author>Boyce, Thomas E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-6c351cd0529efb80aa8575593646635228afa82dc7f519e878a59911049a6ff23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyce, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyce, Thomas E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Power Is in Parsimony: Commentary on Goltz's Operant Analysis of Power Interpretation of Resistance to Change</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior management</jtitle><date>2003-08-04</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>23-27</pages><issn>0160-8061</issn><eissn>1540-8604</eissn><abstract>Comments on Goltz and Hietapelto's article Using the Operant and Strategic Contingencies Models of Power to Understand Resistance to Change are presented. One of the major challenges that we have in dealing with "resistance to change" as a subject matter is to operationally define what is meant. In the Goltz and Hietapelto paper, a clear behavioral definition of "resistance to change" seems to be missing.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1300/J075v22n03_03</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-8061
ispartof Journal of organizational behavior management, 2003-08, Vol.22 (3), p.23-27
issn 0160-8061
1540-8604
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1300_J075v22n03_03
source EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Organizational behavior
Organizational change
title The Power Is in Parsimony: Commentary on Goltz's Operant Analysis of Power Interpretation of Resistance to Change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A52%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Power%20Is%20in%20Parsimony:%20Commentary%20on%20Goltz's%20Operant%20Analysis%20of%20Power%20Interpretation%20of%20Resistance%20to%20Change&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior%20management&rft.au=Boyce,%20Thomas%20E.&rft.date=2003-08-04&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=23-27&rft.issn=0160-8061&rft.eissn=1540-8604&rft_id=info:doi/10.1300/J075v22n03_03&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E405832781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199262253&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true