Piloting the adaptation of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children—2nd edition (KABC-II) to assess school-age neurodevelopment in rural Zimbabwe

Background Neurodevelopment assessment tools for low-resource settings are urgently needed. However, most available tools were developed in high-income settings and may lack cross-cultural validity. Methods We piloted and adapted two subtests within the planning domain of the Kaufman Assessment Batt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wellcome open research 2022, Vol.7, p.274
Hauptverfasser: Piper, Joseph D., Mazhanga, Clever, Mapako, Gloria, Mapurisa, Idah, Mashedze, Tsitsi, Munyama, Eunice, Mwapaura, Marian, Chidhanguro, Dzivaidzo, Gerema, Grace, Tavengwa, Naume V., Ntozini, Robert, Langhaug, Lisa F., Smuk, Melanie, Rochat, Tamsen, Kaufman, Alan, Kaufman, Nadeen, Gladstone, Melissa, Allen, Elizabeth, Prendergast, Andrew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Neurodevelopment assessment tools for low-resource settings are urgently needed. However, most available tools were developed in high-income settings and may lack cross-cultural validity. Methods We piloted and adapted two subtests within the planning domain of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-2nd edition (KABC-II) for use in rural Zimbabwean children aged 7years. After initial assessments of face validity, we created 4 substitutions for the story completion subtest and 7 additions for the pattern reasoning subtest through a co-design process with fieldworkers and child development experts. To assess how successful the changes were, T-tests adjusting for unequal variances were used to compare scores between the original and adapted versions of the same subtest. ANOVA and pairwise analysis was performed to compare the performance of KABC-II subtests across domains. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to explore the variability between domains. Results Initial test scores on the planning domain were significantly lower than the other three domains of learning, sequential memory and simultaneous reasoning (P
ISSN:2398-502X
2398-502X
DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17902.2