Medico-legal Claims Following Amputations in the UK and Ireland

The causes and outcomes of medico-legal claims following amputation were evaluated. A retrospective analysis of the experience of a consultant surgeon acting as an expert witness within the United Kingdom and Ireland (1990–2010). There were 154 claims referred for an opinion of which 53 related to female patients. The median age was 67 (range, 20–101) years. Forty nine (32%) of the patients were known diabetics. Seventy-eight (51%) of the claims actually arose following a medically expected amputation, i.e. an amputation that was not preventable or due to negligence. The other common causes of claims were a delay in the diagnosis and or treatment of arterial ischaemia (34%), and following iatrogenic injuries (5%). Eleven of the claims are still ongoing, 3 went to trial, 52 (34%) were settled out of court and 83 (54%) were discontinued after the claimants were advised that they were unlikely to win their case. Disclosed settlement amounts are reported. Delays in the diagnosis and or treatment of arterial ischaemia were the commonest reasons that a claimant was successful. Half of claims did not proceed but were not without financial and psychological costs.