Long-Term Clinical Outcome of a Single Stent Approach With and Without a Final Kissing Balloon Technique for Coronary Bifurcation: Subanalysis of the TAXUS Japan Postmarket Surveillance Study

Background: The advantages of the final kissing balloon technique (FKB) in a provisional 1-stent approach are under debate. Long-term clinical outcomes remain unclear due to limited data. Methods and Results: Of 2,132 patients (2,502 lesions) enrolled in the TAXUS Japan Postmarket Surveillance Study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation Journal 2014, Vol.78(1), pp.110-121
Hauptverfasser: Yamawaki, Masahiro, Muramatsu, Toshiya, Kozuma, Ken, Ito, Yoshiaki, Kawaguchi, Ren, Kotani, Jun-ichi, Yokoi, Hiroyoshi, Nakamura, Masato, Saito, Shigeru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The advantages of the final kissing balloon technique (FKB) in a provisional 1-stent approach are under debate. Long-term clinical outcomes remain unclear due to limited data. Methods and Results: Of 2,132 patients (2,502 lesions) enrolled in the TAXUS Japan Postmarket Surveillance Study at 56 centers between July 2007 and December 2008, patients having coronary bifurcation treated with a single cross-over stenting with FKB (FKB-group: 132 patients/137 lesions) were compared to those treated without FKB (no-FKB-group: 121 patients/124 lesions). The no-FKB-group was also compared with non-bifurcation patients who had a single-stent implantation (814 patients/937 lesions). The primary outcome was MACE (major adverse clinical events), defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 3 years. Higher late loss and binary restenosis were found in the main vessel (MV) of the FKB-group at the 9-month angiogram compared to the no-FKB-group. At 3 years, MACE was numerically higher (14.6% vs. 6.9%, P=0.07) and TVR was significantly higher (14.6% vs. 5.9%, P
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-13-0346