A Nonadiabatic Ab Initio Dynamics Study on Rhodopsin and Its Analog Isorhodopsin: Chemical Dynamics Reasons behind Selection of Rhodopsin by Life

The structural difference between rhodopsin and isorhodopsin is only in the cis-position of the chromophore, but the difference leads to a large discrepancy in photoisomerization period and quantum yield. The photoinduced cis–trans isomerization dynamics of the two chromophores are investigated usin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemistry letters 2011-12, Vol.40 (12), p.1395-1397
Hauptverfasser: Chung, Wilfredo Credo, Nanbu, Shinkoh, Ishida, Toshimasa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The structural difference between rhodopsin and isorhodopsin is only in the cis-position of the chromophore, but the difference leads to a large discrepancy in photoisomerization period and quantum yield. The photoinduced cis–trans isomerization dynamics of the two chromophores are investigated using a Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics trajectory surface hopping scheme. Rhodopsin shows a straightforward and fast excited-state dynamics whereas the isorhodopsin dynamics in the excited state is complicated due to differences in retinal motions and space gaps formed by surrounding residues. Consequently, the isorhodopsin → bathorhodopsin reaction is slower and less efficient. Photoexcitation of rhodopsin gives bathorhodopsin only, whereas isorhodopsin yields an analog with 9,11-di-cis-retinal in addition to bathorhodopsin. These differences explain why life uses rhodopsin rather than isorhodopsin.
ISSN:0366-7022
1348-0715
DOI:10.1246/cl.2011.1395