Comparative effects of cathepsin inhibitors on rat embryonic development in vitro. Evidence that cathepsin D is unimportant in the proteolytic function of yolk sac

The effects of two proteinase inhibitors, leupeptin and pepstatin on the development of 9·5-day rat conceptuses in vitro has been studied. All cultures were of 48 h duration and the inhibitors were present throughout the entire period. When pepstatin was added to the culture medium (5–25 μg/ml)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Development (Cambridge) 1985-04, Vol.86 (1), p.271-281
Hauptverfasser: FREEMAN, S. J, BROWN, N. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The effects of two proteinase inhibitors, leupeptin and pepstatin on the development of 9·5-day rat conceptuses in vitro has been studied. All cultures were of 48 h duration and the inhibitors were present throughout the entire period. When pepstatin was added to the culture medium (5–25 μg/ml) conceptuses developed and grew to an extent that did not differ from untreated controls. However, leupeptin (l–4 μg/ml) caused severe growth retardation and abnormal development of conceptuses. The effects of the two inhibitors on the hydrolysis of 125 I-labelled BSA and haemoglobin by homogenates of 10·5-day yolk sac indicated the biochemical basis for the differential toxic effects of the two inhibitors on development. Leupeptin was highly inhibitory of the degration of both substrates whereas pepstatin caused no inhibition of 125 I-labelled BSA hydrolysis, and only a slight inhibition of haemoglobin hydrolysis. These observations demonstrate that cathepsin D, a lysosomal aspartic proteinase that is specifically inhibited by pepstatin is not involved in yolk-sac-mediated protein utilization by early organogenesis-phase conceptuses and that lysosomal cysteine proteinases, specifically inhibited by leupeptin, are of paramount importance in this yolk sac function.
ISSN:0950-1991
0022-0752
1477-9129
DOI:10.1242/dev.86.1.271