Comparison of the impact of transdermal versus oral estrogens on biliary markers of gallstone formation in postmenopausal women

This prospective, randomized, double blind, parallel study was undertaken to elucidate further the potential mechanisms through which estrogens could promote the formation of cholesterol gallstones and to compare the impact of nonoral (transdermal) and oral estrogens on serum, hepatic, and biliary m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 1998-02, Vol.83 (2), p.410-414
Hauptverfasser: UHLER, M. L, MARKS, J. W, VOIGT, B. J, JUDD, H. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This prospective, randomized, double blind, parallel study was undertaken to elucidate further the potential mechanisms through which estrogens could promote the formation of cholesterol gallstones and to compare the impact of nonoral (transdermal) and oral estrogens on serum, hepatic, and biliary markers of estrogen action. Ninety-seven postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either transdermal estradiol (E2; 0.1 mg every 3.5 days; n = 48) or oral conjugated equine estrogens (1.25 mg every day; n = 49) for 8 weeks. Blood samples were drawn, and bile samples were obtained by cholecystokinin-stimulated duodenal drainage before and after 8 weeks of estrogen administration. The main outcome measures included serum FSH, LH, E2, estrone, estrone sulfate, sex hormone-binding globulin, lipid profiles, biliary cholesterol saturation index, cholesterol nucleation time, presence of cholesterol crystals in bile, as well as biliary arachidonate, PGE2, and mucous glycoproteins. Estrogens administered by both routes increased circulating estrogens and resulted in similar suppression of both gonadotropins. Sex hormone-binding globulin was clearly increased, and the changes in serum lipids were more pronounced with oral conjugated equine estrogens than with transdermal E2. The biliary cholesterol saturation index was significantly increased compared to the baseline values with both transdermal E2 (1.08 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.00 +/- 0.03; mean change, 8%) and oral conjugated equine estrogens (1.04 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.99 +/- 0.03; mean change, 6%); however, there was no difference between the treatments. The number of patients with cholesterol crystals detected in bile was similar after both estrogen regimens. Transdermal and oral estrogens decreased nucleation time in vitro, increased arachidonate and PGE2 levels, and minimally raised total glycoprotein concentrations. In conclusion, transdermal and oral estrogens exerted comparable nonhepatic effects, as evidenced by similar reductions of gonadotropin levels, but oral therapy exhibited substantially greater actions on hepatic markers of estrogen action. Both transdermal E2 and oral conjugated equine estrogens significantly elevated the biliary cholesterol saturation index and reduced the nucleation time. These results suggest that estrogens at the doses studied could promote gallstone formation by alteration of biliary lipids and cholesterol nucleation time that have been incriminated in this process.
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/jc.83.2.410