Global Versus Decomposed Estimates of Cross-Job Retraining Time

Cross-job retraining is becoming a viable option for coping with increasingly rapid technological changes in the workplace. In this study, we used data col- lected from 836 supervisors in 43 U.S. Air Force enlisted jobs to compare global versus decomposed estimates of cross-job retraining time in te...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human performance 1991-03, Vol.4 (1), p.71-88
Hauptverfasser: Lance, Charles E., Mayfield, David L., Gould, R. Bruce, Lynskey, Michelle C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cross-job retraining is becoming a viable option for coping with increasingly rapid technological changes in the workplace. In this study, we used data col- lected from 836 supervisors in 43 U.S. Air Force enlisted jobs to compare global versus decomposed estimates of cross-job retraining time in terms of interrater reliability and convergent validity. Convergent validities of retrain- ing time estimates were assessed in terms of their correlations with each other and with two additional determinants of retraining ease: learning difficulty of the new job, and old-versus-new job differences in aptitude requirements. In general, the reliabilities for the global and decomposed judgments were com- parable. Additional correlational results supported the convergent validities of both the global and decomposed retraining time estimates.
ISSN:0895-9285
1532-7043
DOI:10.1207/s15327043hup0401_4