Internal Versus External Heat Integration

In this paper we compare internally heat integrated (HIDiC) with state of the art vapour recompression (VR) distillation column on the basis of two criteria: economics and oper-ability for a propylene-propane splitter. A two-step (model-based) procedure was followed consisting of a steady-state opti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical engineering research & design 2006-05, Vol.84 (5), p.374-380
Hauptverfasser: Schmal, J.P., Van Der Kooi, H.J., De Rijke, A., Olujić, Ž., Jansens, P.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper we compare internally heat integrated (HIDiC) with state of the art vapour recompression (VR) distillation column on the basis of two criteria: economics and oper-ability for a propylene-propane splitter. A two-step (model-based) procedure was followed consisting of a steady-state optimization followed by a dynamic optimization. First the design of HIDiC was optimized with respect to annualized cost (steady-state optimization). Next the control of both VR and HIDiC were optimized with respect to operability for a given disturbance scenario (dynamic optimization). The results showed that HIDiC can save 14% in annualized cost compared to VR (safe estimate), but at the cost of operability. Adding only a small percentage of the nominal duty of VR results in much better operability of HIDiC. It is to be expected that model predictive control will improve operability to a degree possibly beyond VR.
ISSN:0263-8762
DOI:10.1205/cherd05041