Comparison of G‐Protein Selectivity of Human 5‐HT 2C and 5‐HT 1A Receptors
A bstract : We compared the ability of human 5‐HT 2C and 5‐HT 1A receptors to couple to selected G proteins expressed in insect Sf9 cells through simultaneous infection with recombinant baculoviruses. We also examined the coupling of G proteins to these same receptors in membranes derived from the S...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2004-10, Vol.1025 (1), p.570-577 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A
bstract
:
We compared the ability of human 5‐HT
2C
and 5‐HT
1A
receptors to couple to selected G proteins expressed in insect Sf9 cells through simultaneous infection with recombinant baculoviruses. We also examined the coupling of G proteins to these same receptors in membranes derived from the Sf9 cells using
in situ
reconstitution with purified G proteins. Our data show that unoccupied 5‐HT
2C
and 5‐HT
1A
receptors can attain an activated conformation that is stabilized by interaction with specific G proteins. While high‐affinity agonist binding to the 5‐HT
2C
receptor was increased to a greater extent by Gα
q
than by Gα
i2
, the high‐affinity agonist binding to the 5‐HT
1A
receptor was preferentially enhanced by Gα
i2
coexpression. When the two 5‐HT receptors were expressed in cells also expressing G proteins, both 5‐HT
2C
and 5‐HT
1A
receptors appear to activate Gα
i2
in preference to Gα
q
. In contrast,
in situ
reconstitution data show that 5‐HT
2C
receptors robustly activate Gα
q
and marginally activate Gα
o
or Gα
i
, whereas 5‐HT
1A
receptors only marginally activate Gα
q
and robustly activate Gα
o
and Gα
i
. These results suggest that the overexpression of receptor and potential G‐protein coupling partners in Sf9 cells may lead to erroneous conclusions as to the signaling selectivity of receptors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0077-8923 1749-6632 |
DOI: | 10.1196/annals.1316.070 |