FEV 6 as a surrogate for FVC in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in the workplace
Compared with measurements of forced vital capacity (FVC), using the forced expiratory volume in six seconds (FEV 6 ) reduces test time and frustration. It was hypothesised that using FEV 6 in the workplace setting would result in an acceptably low misclassification rate for detecting airways obstru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The European respiratory journal 2006-02, Vol.27 (2), p.374-377 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Compared with measurements of forced vital capacity (FVC), using the forced expiratory volume in six seconds (FEV
6
) reduces test time and frustration. It was hypothesised that using FEV
6
in the workplace setting would result in an acceptably low misclassification rate for detecting airways obstruction and spirometry-defined restriction when compared with using the traditional FVC.
Experienced technicians from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health performed spirometry using dry rolling-seal spirometers as per American Thoracic Society guidelines in four workplace investigations. Airways obstruction was defined as an FEV
1
/FVC % below the lower limit of normal (LLN) using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III reference equations. Restriction was defined as an FVC below the LLN with a normal FEV
1
/FVC %. These “gold standard” definitions were compared with definitions based on FEV
6
(obstruction: FEV
1
/FEV
6
below the LLN; restriction: FEV
6
below the LLN with a normal FEV
1
/FEV
6
).
The median (range) age of the 1,139 workers was 37 yrs (18–71 yrs) and 51.4% were male. A significantly high overall agreement was obtained between the two definitions.
In conclusion, the current results confirm that forced expiratory volume in six seconds can be used as a surrogate for forced vital capacity in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in workers, although with some misclassification when compared to obtaining American Thoracic Society-acceptable manoeuvres of longer duration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0903-1936 1399-3003 |
DOI: | 10.1183/09031936.06.00081305 |