Ixazomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (IxPd) in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Characterized with High-Risk Cytogenetics. IFM 2014-01

Background. High risk (HR) cytogenetic remains of poor prognosis, particularly in the RRMM setting. IFM 2010-02 studied pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) and demonstrated limited activity, with a median TTP overall at 5.5 months, and at 7.3 vs 2.8 months in HR RRMM with deletion17p and t(4;14) respectively. We hypothesized that addition of Ixazomib (oral proteasome inhibitor) at increased dose density to Pd (IxPd) in HR RRMM would improve convenience, thus adherence to treatment, and in parallel improve efficacy with no increased toxicity compared to addition of a parental proteasome inhibitor (PI). Methods. Eligible patients had a RRMM, in L2, refractory to lenalidomide, but not to pomalidomide and ixazomib. HR was defined by presence of either del(17p) and/or t(4;14) at diagnosis or study entry. Patients received 17 induction cycles, 21-days long, consisting of ixazomib 3mg/day (d 1, 4, 8 and 11), pomalidomide 4mg/day (d1 to 14) and weekly dexamethasone, followed by a maintenance phase of 28-day cycles with ixazomib 4mg/day (d 1, 8 and 15) and pomalidomide 4mg/day (d 1 to 21), until progression. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). The number of patients to be recruited was initially calculated based on an expected doubling of the median TTP obtained in IFM 2010-02 in either 2 HR RRMM population. No statistical comparison can be done across HR groups given that the study was powered to analyze the 2 groups as a whole. Results. Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study. Median age at inclusion was 72 years (IQ. 67-78), median age at diagnosis was 70 years (IQ. 63-74). Twelve patients presented with del(17p), 9 with t(4;14), and 5 with del(17p) and t(4;14), all patients refractory to lenalidomide. One patient received the study medication but died with no post baseline efficacy assessment. Analyses were done on the remaining 25 patients and safety analysis were performed on all the 26 patients having received at least one dose of the study medication. Twenty-two patients had progressed on study (of whom 12 had died at end of study), 2 patients died before progression, and one patient had no death and no progression. Study treatment was permanently interrupted in 9 patients before progression or death, including 8 during the induction phase. With a median follow-up time of 27 months, the primary end-point median TTP for the efficacy analysis cohort (n=25) was 10.1 months (CI95%. 4.4;13). The median PFS and OS were 9.9 (CI95%. 4.2;12.7)