Is Epigenetic Modulation to Induce Fetal Hemoglobin Translatable in Sickle Cell Mice?

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder caused by a mutation in the β-globin subunit of hemoglobin, resulting in the formation of HbS. Under deoxygenation, HbS polymerizes leading to red blood cell sickling, increased hemolysis and multi-organ damage. During human fetal development, due to expression of the γ-globin gene, the predominant type of hemoglobin produced is fetal hemoglobin (HbF). However, after birth, this shifts to adult globin (HbA or HbS in SCD). This is driven by epigenetic repression of γ-globin due to an increased methylation of its gene promoters. DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) is an important enzyme for DNA methylation and is known to be pivotal in regulation of HbF expression. Reactivation of HbF provides a functional hemoglobin, and therefore has the potential to treat SCD symptoms ( Steinberg et al. JAMA 2003;289:1645-51). HbF induction is an accepted treatment strategy in SCD; even small increases result in decreased vaso-occlusive crises and mortality ( Kato et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018;4:18010). Decitabine inhibits DNMT1 activity, thus promoting γ-globin expression and thereby increasing HbF levels. While inhibition of DNA methylation is known to cause HbF induction in humans and non-human primates, the effects observed in SCD mouse models are more ambiguous. This study investigated to which extent decitabine treatment could induce HbF expression in the Townes SCD model. In Townes mice, the murine globin genes have been substituted for their sickle human counterparts, HBA, HBB sickle and HBG1, and mimic many features of human SCD. Mice aged 4-5 weeks were dosed subcutaneously 3 times a week for 12 weeks with research-grade decitabine (0.6 mg/kg or 0.4 mg/kg) or vehicle. Blood samples were collected for analysis of HbF protein levels by HPLC (represented as % of total Hb) and F-cells by flow cytometry (represented as % of the total RBC population positive for HbF), complete blood counts, histology, and other markers of disease and organ damage. Results are presented as mean ± SD. Groups were compared using an ANCOVA model, adjusting for multiple comparisons (Dunnett) with p