Durable Symptom Improvement for Patients with Non-Transfusion Dependent Thalassemia Treated with Luspatercept: Patient-Reported Outcomes from the BEYOND Study

Background: Patients with non-transfusion dependent beta-thalassemia (NTDT) suffer from chronic anemia due to ineffective erythropoiesis. The phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled BEYOND study demonstrated that luspatercept increased hemoglobin (Hb), reduced transfusion burden, and improved NTDT-related symptoms based on the data with 48 weeks of follow-up (Taher A, et al. Lancet Haematol. 2022;9(10):E733). Objective: The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the long-term effect of luspatercept + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo + BSC on NTDT-related symptoms through 96 weeks using data collected in the BEYOND study. Methods: 145 patients with NTDT were randomized 2:1 to luspatercept (Q3W) + BSC or placebo + BSC. BSC included red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and iron chelation therapy as deemed necessary by investigators. Patients completed the NTDT Patient Reported Outcome (NTDT-PRO) and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) in a daily electronic diary starting 7 days prior to the first dosing day until Week 24, and thereafter over the 7 days prior to dosing at every other dosing visit. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) was administered at every other dosing visit, starting with the first dosing day. The NTDT-PRO consists of 6 questions measuring 2 NTDT anemia-related symptom domains: Tiredness/Weakness (T/W) and Shortness of Breath (SoB), each with a score range of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms). The PGI-S asks patients to rate the overall severity of their NTDT-related symptoms (range of 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating greater severity), whereas the PGI-C asks patients to rate the overall change in their NTDT-related symptoms since the start of the study (7-level verbal rating scale ranging from “a great deal better” to “a great deal worse”). Least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline at each visit (up to Week 96) in NTDT-PRO T/W and SoB scores, as well as the PGI-S score, were estimated using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). Responses to the PGI-C were descriptively summarized by treatment group. All analyses were performed in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL)-evaluable population, defined as all randomized patients with a valid QoL assessment and at least 1 post-baseline assessment. All p-values reported from the analyses were nominal. Results: The HRQoL-evaluable population consisted of 95 of the 96 patients randomized to the luspatercept arm and all 49 patients randomized