Custom High Throughput Drug Sensitivity Assay Reveals Therapeutic Options for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Resistant to or Intolerant of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Introduction. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) care with many patients achieving major and deeper molecular responses. However, for those who are resistant to or do not tolerate the approved TKIs, there are few alternatives. We therefore developed a custom high throughput drug screen comprised of both FDA approved and investigational agents. Methods. Fifty-six samples (50 individual patients) have undergone testing in the drug sensitivity assay, for which a large fraction exhibited resistance to approved agents. The Quellos High Throughput Core Laboratory's Cancer Drug Sensitivity has been CLIA approved for leukemia since 2015. Blood and bone marrow samples were obtained from CML patients with written informed consent. Mononuclear cells were isolated by density depletion. The myeloid population was obtained by lineage depletion of non-myeloid cells using magnetic beads and antibodies to erythroid lineage (CD235a), T (CD3) and B (CD19) lymphocytes, and NK (CD56) cells. Flow cytometry confirmed successful enrichment of the myeloid cell population. Cells were plated on extracellular matrix coated 384 well plates to test under conditions of adhesion mediated chemotherapy resistance. Initially, the assay was comprised of 32 drugs (11 patients) selected based on published activity in CML and resistant CML. The assay was then expanded to 64 drugs. Compounds are added (ranging from 5 pM to 100 μM) to patient samples using the CyBio CyBi-Well Vario and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 72 hours, then viability is assessed by CellTiterGlo. IC50s and AUCs are calculated for each drug using XLFit (IDBS) and a standard 4 parameter logistical model. Transcriptome analysis is planned for these samples. Results. Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Mean and median BCR-ABL1 transcripts were 69% and 70% in diagnosis samples and 63% and 55% in resistant samples, respectively (P=0.607). ABL mutations were present in 5 patients (M244V, T315I, F359I). Additional myeloid mutations were present in 5 of 6 evaluable advanced phase samples, 4 of 17 evaluable diagnostic samples, and 3 of 10 evaluable resistant samples and included ASXL1, DNMT3A, IDH1, JAK2V617F, NRAS, RUNX1, and TET2. Figure 1 illustrates the breadth of sensitivity to agents in the assay. Figure 2 is a heat map of area under the curve (AUCs) illustrating the unique drug sensitivity patterns for all patients, with unsupervised clustering. For