Native T1 Values and Cardiac Involvement in Patients with Thalassemia Major

Background.The T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for the non invasive detection of myocardial iron overload (MIO). The native myocardial T1 mapping has been proposed as a complementary tool, thanks to its higher sensitivity in presence of small amounts of iron, but no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2020-11, Vol.136 (Supplement 1), p.24-25
Hauptverfasser: Pepe, Alessia, Martini, Nicola, De Luca, Antonio, Positano, Vincenzo, Pistoia, Laura, Borsellino, Zelia, Carrai, Valentina, Sanna, Maria Grazia, Bitti, Pier Paolo, Gentili, Sara, Maggio, Aurelio, Sinagra, Gianfranco, Meloni, Antonella
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background.The T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for the non invasive detection of myocardial iron overload (MIO). The native myocardial T1 mapping has been proposed as a complementary tool, thanks to its higher sensitivity in presence of small amounts of iron, but no data are available in literature about its clinical impact. Objective:To explore the clinical impact of T1 mapping for detecting cardiac complications in thalassemia major (TM). Methods.We considered 146 TM patients (87 females, 38.7±11.1 years) consecutively enrolled in the Extension-Myocardial Iron Overload in Thalassemia Network. Three parallel short-axis slices of the left ventricle (LV) were acquired with the Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence. The native T1 values in all 16 myocardial segments were obtained and the global value was the mean. Results.Twenty-one patients had an history of cardiac complications: 11 heart failure, 8 arrhythmias (7 supraventricular and 1 ventricular), and 2 pulmonary hyperthension. Patients with cardiac complications had significantly lower global heart T1 values (879.3±121.9 ms vs 963.2±98.5 ms; P
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2020-134578