A Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR and RT-qPCR for BCR-ABL1 Monitoring in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Background: Monitoring of BCR-ABL1 molecular levels is essential for the management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients treated with Tyrosine Kinases Inhibitors (TKIs). Real Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is currently the standard method for assessing molecular remission (MR) in patients wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Blood 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.2092-2092 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Monitoring of BCR-ABL1 molecular levels is essential for the management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients treated with Tyrosine Kinases Inhibitors (TKIs). Real Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is currently the standard method for assessing molecular remission (MR) in patients with CML. Recently, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has emerged to provide a more accurate detection of minimal residual disease (MRD). In order to hypothesize the use of this new technology in the clinical practice, in the era of TKI discontinuation, we designed a multi-centric study to evaluate the potential value of ddPCR in diagnostic routine.
Aims of the study were:1) the evaluation of the agreement between the measures obtained by ddPCR and RT-qPCR and 2) the assessment of the repeatability of the two methods.
Methods: Total RNA was extracted from 37 CML patients using Maxwell 16 LEV simplyRNA Blood kit (Promega), following the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were divided in 5 groups based on molecular response (MR) as follow: group 1, MR |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-4971 1528-0020 |
DOI: | 10.1182/blood-2019-125614 |