B Cell Precursor Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients with Good Treatment Response Have Low Levels of Erythroid Precursors

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment leads to elimination of blasts and stepwise regeneration of normal hematopoiesis. Several studies identified prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow (BM) before achieving complete remission (Giuseppe Basso et al., J Clin Oncol, 200...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2018-11, Vol.132 (Supplement 1), p.2832-2832
Hauptverfasser: Vakrmanova, Barbora, Novakova, Michaela, Vaskova, Martina, Janotová, Iveta, Vodickova, Elena, Brüggemann, Monika, Fronkova, Eva, Trka, Jan, Stary, Jan, Hrusak, Ondrej, Mejstrikova, Ester
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment leads to elimination of blasts and stepwise regeneration of normal hematopoiesis. Several studies identified prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow (BM) before achieving complete remission (Giuseppe Basso et al., J Clin Oncol, 2009). Crucial question is how to assess BM quality at day 15 (d15) of ALL BFM protocols. In ALL BFM 2009 protocol good quality sample is defined as containing more than 2% erythroid precursors (EP) of nucleated cells. EP were defined as CD19neg(orCD7neg)CD45neg. Two pt cohorts were included in the study. First cohort (Coh2000) consisted of pts treated by AIEOP BFM ALL 2000, n=196 (177 BCP ALL, 19 T ALL, median follow-up 5.4 yrs, range 0.025-10). AIEOP BFM ALL 2000 study was a PCR MRD based protocol (assessment at day d33 and d78) and flow cytometric MRD (FC MRD) was assessed only on research basis at d15. Second cohort (Coh2009) consisted of pts treated by AIEOP BFM ALL 2009, n=331 (292 BCP ALL, 39 T ALL, median follow up 4.8 yrs; range 0.0027-7.6). In Coh2009, both PCR MRD (d33, d78) and FC MRD d15 were used for risk stratification. We asked following questions:What is the specificity and viability of EP defined by CD45 negativity? Is a definition based on bright expression CD71 more specific?Is the amount of EP different between B and T ALLs and between risk groups defined by FC at d15? What is the overall frequency of low EP at d15?What is the relationship between amount of EP and FC MRD at d15?Is there any prognostic relevance of low EP? Results:Population of EP was selected based on negativity of CD45 and a lineage marker (CD19 or CD7) among nucleated cells, which were defined as positive by a SYTO nucleic fluorescent dye. We found a high amount of non-viable cells defined by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) positivity (6.5-96%, median 55%). When we added bright CD71 into the EP definition (EP CD71++), the percentage of DAPI positivity was significantly lower (0-66%, median 9%) (p
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2018-99-117976