Gene Mutation Profile and Risk Stratification in AML1-ETO-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia Based on Next-Generation Sequencing

Gene mutations play a critical role in leukemogenesis of AML1-ETO-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AE-AML). Nevertheless, gene mutation profile in this subtype leukemia remains unclear, and their clinical effect might be underestimated. In this study, we detested gene mutations at diagnosis and rela...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2018-11, Vol.132 (Supplement 1), p.5249-5249
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Guopan, Yin, Changxin, Wu, Fuqun, Jiang, Ling, Zheng, Zhongxin, Xu, Dan, Zhou, Jiaheng, Jiang, Xuejie, Liu, Qifa, Meng, Fanyi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Gene mutations play a critical role in leukemogenesis of AML1-ETO-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AE-AML). Nevertheless, gene mutation profile in this subtype leukemia remains unclear, and their clinical effect might be underestimated. In this study, we detested gene mutations at diagnosis and relapse with next-generation sequencing in 64 newly diagnosed AE-AML patients, and verified the results with Sanger sequencing at the same time. Our results showed that 68.8% patients presented recurrent mutations at diagnosis and 6/11 cases underwent genetic alterations at relapse. C-KIT mutation was the most common event at diagnosis, with an incidence of 42.2%, followed by ASXL1 (15.6%), MET (12.5%), MLH1 (9.4%) , TET2 (7.8%), and FBXW7, TP53 and DNMT3A (7.8%), etc. Also, C-KIT mutation was the most common molecular event associated with relapse (7/11, 63.6%). No significant difference in the clinical characteristic between the gene mutation and wild type (WT) groups was observed, except of higher incidence of additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACAs) (P=0.025) in TP53 mutation patients. C-KIT (exon 8, 17) mutation but not exon 10 adversely affected on survival. Also ASXL1 and TP53 mutation were poor for the RFS (P
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2018-99-113494