Role of Ibrutinib Based Regimen in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Background: Treatment of Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) depends on stage of disease, age, functional status, comorbidities and presence of cytogenetic abnormalities such as (del17p mutation). Ibrutinib was initially approved in CLL given its better response in del17p patients as compared to the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2018-11, Vol.132 (Supplement 1), p.5563-5563
Hauptverfasser: Sardar, Muhammad, Malik, Saad Ullah, Khan, Ali Younas, Sohail, Chaudhry Saad, Ahmad, Malik Qistas, Amin, Saher Nasir, Chakraborty, Rajshekar, McBride, Ali, Azharuddin, Muhammad, Sharon, David, Lee, Patrick, Faridi, Warda, Anwer, Faiz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Treatment of Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) depends on stage of disease, age, functional status, comorbidities and presence of cytogenetic abnormalities such as (del17p mutation). Ibrutinib was initially approved in CLL given its better response in del17p patients as compared to the standard chemo immunotherapy. Since initial approval, Ibrutinib has also been evaluated in del17p negative CLL patients. Aim of our study is to discuss the efficacy of ibrutinib based regimen in CLL. Methods: Seven databases (Pub Med/Medline, Elsevier/Embase, Elsevier/Scopus, Wiley/Cochrane Library, and Thomas Reuters/Web of Science, EBSCO/CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov.) were searched in accordance with PRISMA statement guidelines using the following keywords: chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib, and PCI32765. Inclusion criteria included prospective clinical trials using Ibrutinib in CLL patients with outcome data available. We excluded systematic reviews, met analysis, case reports and case series. Aim of our review was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Treatment naïve (TN)patientIn the extended 5-year median follow up of a phase 1/2b trial (n=31), the ORR with single agent Ibr was 87% (CR-29%). The 5-year PFS and OS was 92%. In phase 3 trial by Burger et al (2015), ORR with Ibr was 92% (CR18%) in 136 patients. 2-year PFS and OS was 89% and 95% respectively. Del17p patients were excluded. Recent phase 2 trial by Jain et al (2017), combination of ibr with fludarabine (flu), cyclophosphamide (cyclo) and obinutuzumab (G) achieved ORR of 100% (CR 46%) in 32 del17p negative patients. In the phase 2 trial by Davids et al (2017) in 49 patients (< 65 years) the ORR was 100% (CR 63%). Phase 1b/2 trial by Migouel, ORR was 96% (CR 52%) with a combination regimen of Ibr + G + venetoclax. Relapsed/refractory (R/R)patient:In a phase 3 trial by Byrd et al (2014), in 195 patients (median age: 67; del17p: 32%; median prior therapies: 3) the ORR was 63%(CR-O). Median follow up was 9.4 months with 6-month PFS of 88% and 12 months OS of 90%. Phase 2 trial by Burger et al (2014), the ORR was 95% (CR 8%) in 40 patients (median age:63%; del17p:50%; median prior therapies:2). The 18-month PFS and OS was 78% and 84% respectively. In the phase 3 trial by Chanan et al (2016), in 289 (median age 64) del17p negative patients with
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2018-99-110257