Translocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor?

Many trials in myeloma are stratified on cytogenetic abnormalities. Among them, the most commonly chosen are the t(4;14), the del(17p), and the t(14;16). If data are well established for t(4;14) and del(17p), very few data support the use of t(14;16). To address this issue, we retrospectively analyz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2011-02, Vol.117 (6), p.2009-2011
Hauptverfasser: Avet-Loiseau, Hervé, Malard, Florent, Campion, Loic, Magrangeas, Florence, Sebban, Catherine, Lioure, Bruno, Decaux, Olivier, Lamy, Thierry, Legros, Laurence, Fuzibet, Jean-Gabriel, Michallet, Mauricette, Corront, Bernadette, Lenain, Pascal, Hulin, Cyrille, Mathiot, Claire, Attal, Michel, Facon, Thierry, Harousseau, Jean-Luc, Minvielle, Stephane, Moreau, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Many trials in myeloma are stratified on cytogenetic abnormalities. Among them, the most commonly chosen are the t(4;14), the del(17p), and the t(14;16). If data are well established for t(4;14) and del(17p), very few data support the use of t(14;16). To address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed 1003 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma for this abnormality. We identified 32 patients with the t(14;16). Compared with patients lacking the t(14;16), we did not observe any difference in overall survival (P = .28). Moreover, in multivariate analyses, the t(14;16) was not prognostic (P = .39). In conclusion, our data do not support the use of t(14;16)-specific probes in the diagnostic panels of multiple myeloma.
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2010-07-295105