Does Testing Improve Learning for College Students With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder?

Taking tests on to-be-learned material is one of the most powerful learning strategies available to students. We examined the magnitude and mechanisms of the testing effect in college students with (n = 25) and without (n = 75) attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder by comparing the effect of prac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical psychological science 2016-01, Vol.4 (1), p.136-143
Hauptverfasser: Knouse, Laura E., Rawson, Katherine A., Vaughn, Kalif E., Dunlosky, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Taking tests on to-be-learned material is one of the most powerful learning strategies available to students. We examined the magnitude and mechanisms of the testing effect in college students with (n = 25) and without (n = 75) attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder by comparing the effect of practice testing versus a comparable amount of restudy on long-term recall. Participants learned two lists of 48 words representing eight categories—one via eight consecutive study trials and another via four alternating study and test trials—and took recall tests 2 days later. Both groups demonstrated a moderate testing effect (ds = 0.50, 0.57), and testing improved memory by enhancing both relational and item-specific processing. Results support the use of test-enhanced learning to promote the academic achievement of college students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the inclusion of self-testing strategies into skills-based interventions for this population.
ISSN:2167-7026
2167-7034
DOI:10.1177/2167702614565175