Long-term effects of a standardized feedback-driven quality improvement program for timely reperfusion therapy in regional STEMI care networks

Aims: Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines state that repetitive monitoring and feedback should be implemented for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment, but no evidence is available supporting this recommendation. We aimed to analyze the long-term effects of a formalized...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care 2021-05, Vol.10 (4), p.397-405, Article 2048872620907323
Hauptverfasser: Scholz, Karl Heinrich, Lengenfelder, Bjoern, Jacobshagen, Claudius, Fleischmann, Claus, Moehlis, Hiller, Olbrich, Hans G., Jung, Jens, Maier, Lars S., Maier, Sebastian K. G., Bestehorn, Kurt, Friede, Tim, Meyer, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims: Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines state that repetitive monitoring and feedback should be implemented for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment, but no evidence is available supporting this recommendation. We aimed to analyze the long-term effects of a formalized data assessment and systematic feedback on performance and mortality within the prospective, multicenter Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in STEMI (FITT-STEMI) study. Methods: Regular interactive feedback sessions with local STEMI management teams were performed at six participating German percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers over a 10-year period starting from October 2007. Results: From the first to the 10th year of study participation, all predefined key-quality indicators for performance measurement used for feedback improved significantly in all 4926 consecutive PCI-treated patients - namely, the percentages of patients with pre-hospital electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings (83.3% vs 97.1%,p< 0.0001) and ECG recordings within 10 minutes after first medical contact (41.7% vs 63.8%,p< 0.0001), pre-announcement by telephone (77.0% vs 85.4%,p= 0.0007), direct transfer to the catheterization laboratory bypassing the emergency department (29.4% vs 64.2%,p< 0.0001), and contact-to-balloon times of less than 90 minutes (37.2% vs 53.7%,p< 0.0001). Moreover, this feedback-related continuous improvement of key-quality indicators was linked to a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality from 10.8% to 6.8% (p= 0.0244). Logistic regression models confirmed an independent beneficial effect of duration of study participation on hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.986, 95% confidence interval = 0.976-0.996,p= 0.0087). In contrast, data from a nationwide PCI registry showed a continuous increase in in-hospital mortality in all PCI-treated STEMI patients in Germany from 2008 to 2015 (n= 398,027; 6.7% to 9.2%,p< 0.0001). Conclusions: Our results indicate that systematic data assessment and regular feedback is a feasible long-term strategy and may be linked to improved performance and a reduction in mortality in STEMI management.
ISSN:2048-8726
2048-8734
2048-8734
DOI:10.1177/2048872620907323