First multicenter study evaluating the utility of the BENCHMARK TM BMX TM 81 large-bore access catheter in neurovascular interventions

This study is the first multicentric report on the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of utilizing a large bore (0.081″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions. Data were retrospectively collected from seven sites in the United States for neurovascular procedures via...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Interventional neuroradiology 2024-06, p.15910199241262848
Hauptverfasser: Abdelsalam, Ahmed, Fountain, Hayes B, Ramsay, Ian A, Luther, Evan M, Sowlat, Mohammad Mahdi, Silva, Michael A, Hassan, Ameer E, Patel, Aman B, Eatz, Tiffany, Joseph, Pradeep, Regenhardt, Robert W, Satti, Sudhakar R, Siddiqui, Adnan H, Sanikommu, Sai, Baig, Ammad A, Khandelwal, Priyank, Spiotta, Alejandro M, Starke, Robert M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study is the first multicentric report on the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of utilizing a large bore (0.081″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions. Data were retrospectively collected from seven sites in the United States for neurovascular procedures via large bore 0.081″ inner diameter access catheter (Benchmark BMX81, Penumbra, Inc.). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as the access catheter reaching its target vessel. Safety outcomes included periprocedural device-related and access site complications. There were 90 consecutive patients included. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR: 53, 68); 53% were female. The most common interventions were aneurysm embolization (33.3%), carotid stenting (12.2%), and arteriovenous malformation embolization (11.1%). The transradial approach was most used (56.7%), followed by transfemoral (41.1%). Challenging anatomic variations included severe vessel tortuosity (8/90, 8.9%), type 2 aortic arch (7/90, 7.8%), type 3 aortic arch (2/90, 2.2%), bovine arch (2/90, 2.2%), and severe angle (
ISSN:1591-0199
2385-2011
DOI:10.1177/15910199241262848