Panel on Complementary Methods of Modeling Team Performance

While computational team modeling techniques and tools have advanced significantly, relatively few efforts have incorporated several distinct approaches toward a common goal. The Office of Naval Research sponsored Manning Affordability Initiative has applied 3 modeling technologies to a single domai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2001, Vol.45 (24), p.1723-1727
Hauptverfasser: Pharmer, James A., Freeman, Jared T., Scott-Nash, Shelly, Santoro, Thomas P., Kieras, David
Format: Review
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While computational team modeling techniques and tools have advanced significantly, relatively few efforts have incorporated several distinct approaches toward a common goal. The Office of Naval Research sponsored Manning Affordability Initiative has applied 3 modeling technologies to a single domain (air defense warfare), a common scenario, and watchstation technologies (current AEGIS technology and human-centered design prototypes). This has provided an unusual opportunity to investigate these tools, and ways in which they can be used together. Team Optimal Design (TOD) focuses on team modeling. Integrated Performance Modelling Environment (IPME) uses a general task modeling technique that applies well to individuals or teams. The GOMS Language Evaluation and Analysis Tool (GLEAN) combines individual models of users interacting as a team. This panel discussion focuses on these 3 methods and their combined uses. Further, a human-in-the-loop experiment conducted to provide data against which to validate the computational models will be summarized.
ISSN:1541-9312
1071-1813
2169-5067
DOI:10.1177/154193120104502405