Xen gel stent implant for persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the XEN-Stent for managing unresponsive to medical therapy secondary glaucoma after silicone oil (SO) removal. This retrospective chart reviewed 12 patients who underwent vitrectomy and SO endotamponade. They experienced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of ophthalmology 2024-08, p.11206721241272273
Hauptverfasser: Boscia, Francesco, Ferreri, Paolo, Sisto, Dario, Niro, Alfredo, Boscia, Giacomo, Scotti, Giacomo, Viggiano, Pasquale, Sborgia, Alessandra, Sborgia, Giancarlo, Giancipoli, Ermete, Alessio, Giovanni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the XEN-Stent for managing unresponsive to medical therapy secondary glaucoma after silicone oil (SO) removal. This retrospective chart reviewed 12 patients who underwent vitrectomy and SO endotamponade. They experienced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation after SO removal despite taking the maximum tolerated glaucoma medication. Eleven eyes underwent an XEN-implant, while 1 underwent an XEN-implant with phacoemulsification/IOL implantation. The primary outcome was to achieve success criteria: IOP 20% IOP reduction without medication (complete success) or with medication (qualified success) and without a secondary IOP-lowering procedure. IOP, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the number of glaucoma medications (Glaucoma Medication Score-GMS) were recorded at baseline, 1 day, 1 week, 1 (M1), 3 (M3), 6 (M6), and 12 (M12) months postoperatively. Baseline characteristics included males percentage 66.6%, mean age of 61.8 ± 5.7 years, BCVA 0.69 ± 0.3 logMAR, IOP 30 ± 4.2 mmHg, and GMS 3.1 ± 0.5. There was a significant reduction in IOP by 14 ± 1.9 mmHg and GMS by 0.27 ± 0.6 at M12 compared to baseline (p 
ISSN:1120-6721
1724-6016
DOI:10.1177/11206721241272273