The Impact of Role Authority and Communication Initiative on HAT Outcomes
Theobjective ofthisstudy wasto understand howrole authority and communication initiative of autonomous agents impact Human-Autonomy Team (HAT) performance, trust, workload, and cohesion. The study employed a 2 (role authority: peer vs.subordinate) x 2 (communication initiative: proactive vs.reactive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2022-09, Vol.66 (1), p.807-811 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Theobjective ofthisstudy wasto understand howrole authority and communication initiative of autonomous agents impact Human-Autonomy Team (HAT) performance, trust, workload, and cohesion. The study employed a 2 (role authority: peer vs.subordinate) x 2 (communication initiative: proactive vs.reactive robot communication) mixed factorial design.Participantsworkedcollaboratively with Boston Dynamic’s Spot robotto conductanin-person search and rescue taskin afield environment.The study revealedthe subordinate role authority condition, where therobot-is-subordinate tothehuman, imposed a higher workload thanthe peer condition, where the robot-is-peertothe human. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-5067 1071-1813 2169-5067 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1071181322661503 |